google-site-verification: googlec7193c3de77668c9.html
Thursday , September 3 2026

Google critics think the search remedies ruling is a total whiff

While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.

Advertisements

Check Also

Xiaomi’s Passport Foldable Phone Takes Aim at Apple and Samsung

I love Xiaomi’s phones and gave the recent Leitzphone — made in collaboration with photography …

Philips Hue adds more affordable options for syncing smart lights with your TV

Philips Hue is slashing the steep entry price of its entertainment sync offerings. The new …

Here’s the first 4K 120Hz UST projector with optical lens shift

Detail-preserving optical lens shift is not something you expect to find on an ultra-short throw …

Leave a Reply

Available for Amazon Prime