
Garner said she would “absolutely not” sign the current deal in place if it was presented to the organisation now, and said some vague aspects of the agreement have led to legal disputes over the contract.
“The relationship with the football club historically has been quite tense,” she told assembly members.
“We’ve disagreed on interpretations around the contractual piece. And I don’t think that’s any surprise when the taxpayer is under such a huge pressure.
“It’s a very good contract for West Ham United. Well done, is what I say, in terms of the original negotiation – but it causes pressures and tensions.
“It doesn’t matter whether it’s fair or not. A commercial deal was done, and we’re in a contract, and we must honour it.”
“I’d like to see the whole thing set aside and to start again, but I can’t see that happening,” she added.
Garner outlined five measures to help mitigate the annual losses:
-
Moving WHUFC Women to the London Stadium at the club’s expense, although Garner said “there’s a dispute about how it interacts with the contract and the cost of it”
-
Seeking permission to hold more major non-football events – at the moment Newham Council currently caps the venue at 10 non-football events annually, compared to 50 at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium
-
Making the interior feel less “sterile” by turning the seats claret, which Garner said would feel “more intimate, more West Ham”
-
Exploiting surrounding land for food, beverage, and leisure developments
-
Preparing to market stadium naming rights once the club returns to the Premier League to avoid settling for an under-priced 10-year deal while in the Championship.
The committee had invited Karim Virani, the new interim chief executive officer (CEO) of WHUFC, and former mayor Boris Johnson, in front of the committee, but neither was able to make it.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, external, X, external and Instagram, external. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk, external