Noel Clarke accuses Guardian publisher of ‘fabricating’ evidence in libel claim

At a hearing at the High Court, Mr Clarke’s barrister Arthur Lo told Mrs Justice Steyn that after Mr Clarke had threatened legal action, the Guardian’s head of investigations told two of the newspaper’s journalists to delete a number of messages on the encrypted messaging app Signal, and that other evidence was fabricated.

Mr Clarke’s legal team told the court that this provided overwhelming evidence of perversion of the course of justice, and alleged that the newspaper’s head of investigations had committed a criminal act by perverting the course justice, all of which he and the Guardian denies.

They claimed that the Guardian’s actions had made a fair trial impossible.

The Guardian’s barrister Gavin Millar KC contended that Noel Clarke’s “hopelessly weak” accusations were intended to smear its journalists without any proper justification, and to launder defamatory allegations about Guardian employees into the public domain, allegations which couldn’t be justified if made outside of court.

The newspaper said that much of the data that Mr Clarke claimed had been destroyed, had in fact been retained and disclosed.

It added that any data that was erased was the result of the newspaper’s routine approach to data minimisation – particularly when dealing with confidential sources who required protection.

The newspaper said it had disclosed 3,000 documents related to the proceedings.

The Guardian rejected the allegation of fabrication of evidence and destruction of messages saying it was clearly untrue, and that there was no worthwhile evidence to support this accusation.

The judge Mrs Justice Steyn is hearing arguments on whether the Guardian’s defence to the claim should be struck out for reasons put forward by Noel Clarke.

The full trial is currently listed to start at the beginning of March, and is scheduled to last for six weeks.