google-site-verification: googlec7193c3de77668c9.html

Molly Tea: Backlash after firm ordered to pay Louis Vuitton $1.5m

Advertisements

Popular Chinese tea chain Molly Tea has been ordered to pay 10.3m yuan (£1.1m; $1.5m) in damages after a court ruled that its logo infringed a Louis Vuitton trademark, fuelling an online debate over copyright protection.

Chinese media reported last week that a court in the eastern Jiangsu province ruled that the Shenzhen-based tea company had copied Louis Vuitton’s iconic four-petal flower monogram trademark.

The decision has divided the public online in China, with a hashtag linked to the case drawing more than 400 million views and tens of thousands of comments.

The BBC has contacted Molly Tea and Louis Vuitton for comment.

On Thursday, a court in Suzhou, just east of Shanghai, ordered Molly Tea to stop using of the logo, issue a public apology and to pay damages to Louis Vuitton, according to Chinese state media China Daily.

The outlet also said that Molly Tea and its affiliated firms had applied for multiple trademarks that were rejected by the China National Intellectual Property Administration.

Only the trademark containing the Chinese characters for “Molly Tea” was successfully registered, China Daily reported.

Many Chinese social media users have defended the design of Molly Tea’s logo, noting how many designs used in Western luxury brands have been inspired by Chinese artefacts.

One commenter on the Weibo platform wrote in Mandarin that he will “drink a cup of Molly Tea daily” to show his support for the company.

“Give me a break. They’re just taking advantage of the fact that our ancestors didn’t file for patents,” the commenter wrote.

One user on RedNote, another Chinese social media platform, said: “Such basic geometric shapes have been used everywhere throughout history, not just China.”

But some online supported the court’s verdict.

A Weibo user said that those who back Molly Tea’s design should “study law first”, arguing that there is no dispute as Louis Vuitton had already registered the trademark.

Another said Louis Vuitton is justified in defending its intellectual property and that other brands do not have the right to imitate it, regardless of their industry.


BBC News

Views: 0

See also  What do South Koreans think about Seoul's hologram cop?

Check Also

BTS say they won’t submit music to the Grammy Awards

Korean pop group BTS have announced they will not submit their music for consideration at …

Japan earthquake: Survivors describe the shock of the 6.8-magnitude tremor

Business was winding down for the day at Sendan Shokudo, a diner in Japan’s southwestern …

Japan: Magnitude 7.1 earthquake in Kyushu leaves several injured, damages buildings

A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck south-west Japan, leaving several people injured and prompting a brief …

Leave a Reply

Available for Amazon Prime
Elfbar elfliq sour apple nikotinsalz liquid 20 mg/ml nikotin quantity.