The Tasmanian tiger, or thylacine, is something of a mythic creature in Australian folklore. The last documented animal — Benjamin — died in captivity in 1936, but in the 85 years since, tiger sightings have been consistently reported in Tasmania, an island off the south coast of Australia. Claims are a constant feature in the local press, but there’s a bold, new declaration suggesting “not ambiguous” evidence of the thylacine.
In a video uploaded to YouTube on Monday, Neil Waters, president of the Thylacine Awareness Group of Australia, claims to have rediscovered the thylacine on a camera trap set up in north-east Tasmania. “I know what they are and so do a few independent expert witnesses,” he says as he walks down the street with a can of beer in his hand.
Flicking through images from his SD card, Waters claims to have seen not just one thylacine — but an entire family. You can view the entire video below.
“We believe the first image is the mum, we know the second image is the baby because it’s so tiny and the third image… is the dad,” Waters says. “The baby has stripes,” he notes, among a litany of other characteristics he provides as proof. According to Waters, the images have been sent to the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery
Waters states in the video he has handed the images over to Nick Mooney, a thylacine expert, at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG). We’ve reached out to Waters, Mooney and the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, but have yet to receive a response regarding the claims.
With no confirmed sightings since 1936, it’s hard to take the latest claims at face value. The tiger was known to be a quiet and solitary creature, but in 2021 with the abundance of smartphone cameras and ever-dwindling places to hide, what has the tiger been doing all these years? Waters claims in the video the group shows the tigers are breeding, but more intense scrutiny is now underway.
The Tasmanian Government’s Department of Parks, Water and Environment believe any sort of group would likely suffer from inbreeding, making long-term survival untenable. “Even if there did exist a few remaining individuals, it is unlikely that such a tiny population would be able to maintain a sufficient genetic diversity to allow for the viable perpetuation of the species in the long-term,” it writes.
“Nobody can adequately look at a video and say that’s definitely a thylacine, without some DNA evidence,” says Andrew Pask, a marsupial evolutionary biologist at the University of Melbourne. “We’ve got to have a hair sample, a scat sample, something that can back it up.”
Pask has been studying how the thylacine is genetically similar to wolves and dogs at the University of Melbourne. “Nobody wants to believe that they’re out there more than me, right?” Pask laughs.
But if it’s not a Tasmanian tiger, what could it be? Perhaps a dog, perhaps another wild creature like a bandicoot. The best case scenario is that TMAG finds something unusual in the footage and then further work, like hair traps and scat samples, get taken to confirm the creature’s existence.
In Australia, there have been calls to resurrect the extinct creatures for over two decades. In 1999, paleontologist Michael Archer took over as director of the Australian Museum and committed around $57 million to a project that could clone the iconic marsupial from old specimens.